I started out with this pi
In some way I guess I wanted to not only make a joke but maybe get people to wonder about this person on the pavement - another reason that excluding text was probably a poor choice after all. The social movement he inspired seems to have died out in all but a few circles; it was never too widespread, but so much great art came out of it, so much discussion of alternate viewpoints (Ginsberg and his young men made quite a splash, I must say). The liberalization of published media comes out of the efforts of this man and his friends, so why are they so rarely recognized outside of literary circles?
Granted, beat has always been an undercurrent rather than part of the society - indeed, it is a rejection of the mainstream - but maybe we should take their advice and seek out and question the things we take for granted in everyday structures and lifestyles. Finding the symbolic in the everyday was a large part of their philosophy, and Kerouac's image on the blacktop becomes self-referencing in that cheeky post-modern way and hopefully leads to a consideration of the ideas behind that road. Why do we obey the signs that tell us that only buses are allowed on that section of road? What does that imply? What authority do these signs have over other types?
I also saw several people actually stepping out into the middle of the road on the terminal after I was finished, and that made me consider why we are so intrigued by images and text being present in an unusual space. That is, of course, part of graffiti in the first place. A graffito draws attention to itself by virtue of being an invasive signifier. Whereas we walk past road signs we've seen a billion times assuming we know their message, street art attempts to jolt us out of that passive observation. Very beat in nature, no?
After a series of what would be euphemistically called 'technical difficulties' but what


No comments:
Post a Comment